...
- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html: based on that AGPL should be used, to "advance the cause" Apache License 2.0 might be appropriate too
- https://www.linux.com/news/biz-os/legal/26690-licensing-101-for-open-source-projects-choosing-an-open-source-license + https://www.linux.com/news/biz-os/legal/28138-licensing-101-for-open-source-projects-pick-a-license: nie veľmi nápomocné :)
- http://www.zdnet.com/blog/burnette/howto-pick-an-open-source-license-part-1/130 + http://www.zdnet.com/blog/burnette/how-to-pick-an-open-source-license-part-2/131: no, no?, maybe, would be nice (i.e. yes) => EPL, SDDL, MPL or BSD ... hmm, nepomohlo veľmi
- http://blog.milkingthegnu.org/2008/03/10-answers-for.html: GPL, LGPL
- http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#license-quickstart: GPL
Aké knižnice už pouzívame a čo z toho vyplýva:
...